Cocaine use has been generally linked to DKA but whether it’s through its antagonizing effect on insulin action or more indirectly through its association with non-compliance with insulin, or both, is not totally clear.
A retrospective study found cocaine users to account for 14% of all DKA admissions.1 Cocaine users were also less likely than controls to have an intercurrent illness identified as a precipitant for DKA, and more likely to have missed taking insulin prior to admission. Another study also reported active cocaine use to be associated with DKA, but found its effect to be independent of non-compliance. 2
Yet another retrospective study limited to patients admitted with hyperglycemia, found no significant association between active cocaine use and development of hyperglycemic crisis.
There are reasons to believe that cocaine may contribute to DKA. Cocaine has been proposed as a possible precipitant of DKA due to its ability to potentially enhance counterregulatory mechanisms designed to antagonize the effect of insulin by increasing catecholamine and cortisol levels. 1,3
So next time you have a patient with DKA, consider cocaine as a possible precipitant, particularly when the cause of DKA is unclear.
- Warner EA, Greene GS, Buchsbaum MS et al. Diabetic ketoacidosis associated with cocaine use. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158:1799-802. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9738609
- Nyenwe E, Loganathan R, Blum S, et al. Active use of cocaine: An independent risk factor for recurrent diabetic ketoacidosis in a city hospital. Endocr Pract 2007;13:22-29. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17360297
- Modzelewski KL, Rybin DV, Weinberg JM, et al. Active cocaine use does not increase the likelihood of hyperglycemic crisis. J Clin Transl Endocrinol 2017;9:1-7 http://www.jctejournal.com/article/S2214-6237(16)30056-4/pdf
Contributed in part by Quin L Sievers, Medical Student, Harvard Medical School
“Vision loss or blurriness” is one of the most common manifestations of acute hyperglycemia in diabetic patients and is due to the osmotic swelling of the lens resulting in changes in its characteristics and the inability to properly focus an image.1
Since glucose acts as a solute, an increase in the concentration of glucose causes a rise in osmotic forces and movement of fluid into the lens, resulting in transient myopia. Interestingly, the increase in the fluid in the lens causes a change in its refractory index which is associated with focusing an image at a different length; it does not affect its curvature or position.
Baseline vision should be eventually restored by correcting glucose levels.2 Also remember that rapid correction of hyperglycemia may make the lens swelling worse, causing increased visual disturbances.3
Fun fact: Did you know that chronic hyperglycemia is associated with cataract formation due to excess conversion of glucose to sorbitol in the lens? 4
- Bron A.J, Sparrow J, Brown N, Harding J, Blakytny, R. The Lens in Diabetes. Eye 1993; 7: 260-75 https://www.nature.com/articles/eye199360.pdf
- Huntjens B. O’Donnell C. Refractive error changes in Diabetes Mellitus. Optometry in Practice 2006; 7:103-114. http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/6185/3/Refractive_Error_Changes_in_DM_FINAL.pdf
- Sychev YV, Zepeda EM, Lam DL. Bilateral cateract formation via acute spontaneous fracture of the lens following treatment of hyperglycemic hyperosmolar syndrome: Case report. Am J Ophthalmol 2017;7:66-69. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29260081
- Pollreisz A, Ursula SE. Diabetic Cataract—Pathogenesis, Epidemiology and Treatment. Journal of Ophthalmology 2010; vol. 2010, Article ID 608751. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/joph/2010/608751
Contributed by Felicia Hsu, Medical Student, Harvard Medical School
Night sweats (NS) is a common patient complaint, affecting about a third of hospitalized patients on medical wards1. Despite its long list of potential causes, direct relationship between the often- cited conditions and NS is usually unclear2, its cause may remain elusive In about a third to half of cases in the primary care setting, and its prognosis, at least in those >65 y of age, does not appear to be unfavorable 2,3.
Selected commonly and less frequently cited conditions associated with NS are listed (Table)2-9. Although tuberculosis is one of the first conditions we think of when faced with a patient with NS, it should be emphasized that NS is not common in this disease (unless advanced) and is rare among hospitalized patients as a cause of their NS1,9.
In one of the larger study of adult patients seen in primary care setting, 23% reported pure NS and an additional 18% reported night and day sweats5; the prevalence of NS in both men and women was highest in 41-55 y age group. In multivariate analyses, factors associated with pure NS in women were hot flashes and panic attacks; in men, sleep disorders.
Table. Selected causes of night sweats
||Less frequently cited
|Neoplastic/hematologic (eg, lymphoma, leukemia, myelofibrosis)
Infections (eg, HIV, tuberculosis, endocarditis)
Endocrine (eg, ovarian failure, hyperthyroidism, orchiectomy, carcinoid tumor, diabetes mellitus [nocturnal hypoglycemia], pheochromocytoma)
Rheumatologic (eg, giant cell arteritis)
|Gastroesophageal reflux disease
Drugs (eg, anti-depressants, SSRIs, donepezil [Aricept], tacatuzumab)
Sleep disturbances (eg, obstructive sleep apnea)
Panic attacks/anxiety disorder
- Lea MJ, Aber RC, Descriptive epidemiology of night sweats upon admission to a university hospital. South Med J 1985;78:1065-67.
- Mold JW, Holtzclaw BJ, McCarthy L. Night sweats: A systematic review of the literature. J Am Board Fam Med 2012; 25-878-893.
- Mold JW, Lawler F. The prognostic implications of night sweats in two cohorts of older patients. J Am Board Fam Med 2010;23:97-103.
- Mold JW, Holtzclaw BJ. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and night sweats in a primary care population. Drugs-Real World Outcomes 2015;2:29-33.
- Mold JW, Mathew MK, Belgore S, et al. Prevalence of night sweats in primary care patients: An OKPRN and TAFP-Net collaborative study. J Fam Pract 2002; 31:452-56.
- Feher A, Muhsin SA, Maw AM. Night sweats as a prominent symptom of a patient presenting with pulmonary embolism. Case reports in Pulmonology 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/841272
- Rehman HU. Vitamin B12 deficiency causing night sweats. Scottish Med J 2014;59:e8-11.
- Murday HK, Rusli FD, Blandy C, et al. Night sweats: it may be hemochromatosis. Climacteric 2016;19:406-8.
- Fred HL. Night sweats. Hosp Pract 1993 (Aug 15):88.
Although DM was originally thought to be an independent risk factor for DM1,2, more recent data suggest otherwise.
A population-based study involving residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, calculated the incidence of VTE among patients with DM over a 25-year period and found it to be higher than that of controls 2 . However, in the same study, after controlling for hospitalization for major surgery or medical illness and nursing home confinement, no association between DM and VTE was found2 .
A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies involving over 1 million patients found no significant association between DM and VTE when controlled for common risk factors (eg, obesity, sedentary life style, smoking, hypertension, or dyslipidemia)3. The authors concluded that DM and its complications are not independent risk factors for incident VTE.
Thus, it appears that much of the risk of DVT in DM may be related to its comorbidities and the need for hospitalization, surgery or nursing home stay.
- Petrauskiene V, Falk M, Waernbaum I, et al. The risk of venous thromboembolism is markedly elevated in patients with diabetes. Diabetologia 2005;48:1017-21. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15778859
- Heit JA, Leibson CL, Ashrani AA, et al. Is diabetes mellitus an independent risk factor for venous thromboembolism? A population-based case-control study. Thromb Vasc Biol 2009; 29:1399-1405. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2735343/
- Gariani K, Mavrakanas T, Combescure C, et al. Is diabetes mellitus a risk factor for venous thromboembolism? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Eur J Intern Med 2016;28:52-58. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26507303
This is a common scenario among our hospitalized patients with indwelling catheters, prior antibiotic therapy or diabetes mellitus who seem to have no clinical signs of infection. Fortunately, candidemia from urinary sources appears uncommon to rare, with up to nearly ½ of patients clearing their candiduria with removal of the indwelling catheter alone (1). The Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines do not recommended treatment of asymptomatic candiduria unless the patient belongs to a group at high risk of dissemination, such as severely immunosuppressed or neutropenic patients, infants with low birth weight, and patients who will undergo urologic manipulation (2). Supporting such recommendation is a retrospective long-term follow-up of patients with candiduria demonstrating no significant improvement in rates of recurrences of candiduria or candidemia with treatment (3). Fluconazole is usually considered the first-line agent of choice when treatment is indicated.
1. Kauffman CA. Candiduria. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41:S371-6.
2. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes D, et al. Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Candidiasis: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48:503–35.
3. Revankar SG, Hasan MS, Revankar VS, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with candiduria. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2011;30:137-140.
The short answer is “No”! The myth that diabetics with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections should be routinely placed on antibiotics against gram-positives as well as gram-negatives and/or anaerobes probably originates from the extrapolation of data revolving around the frequent polymicrobial nature of diabetic foot infections. These infections often originate from chronic ulcers and are complicated by deep tissue infection or gangrene (1), which is often not the case in our diabetic patients with cellulitis alone.
In a recent study of the microbiology of cellulitis or cutaneous abscess in hospitalized patients, Staphylococcus and Streptococcus sp. accounted for 90% of cultured organisms in diabetic patients, not significantly different than that of non-diabetics (1). This finding also supports national guidelines which do not recommend routine use of broader spectrum antibiotics in diabetics with cellulitis or cutaneous abscess (2). This may be a good area to include in our antibiotic stewardship practices.
1. Jenkins TC, Knepper BC, Moore SJ, et al. Comparison of the microbiology and antibiotic treatment among diabetic and nondiabetic patients hospitalized for cellulitis or cutaneous abscess. J Hosp Med 2014;9:788-794.
2. Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections. Clin Infect Dis 2014;59:e10-e52.