Author: FA Manian MD, MPH

Is it just my imagination or are Covid-19 cases going down as influenza cases are surging out of control during this flu season?

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , Leave a comment

No, you are not imagining! Although during respiratory tract infection (RTI) season several viruses such as rhinovirus, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and coronavirus may cocirculate, influenza virus frequently outcompetes many RTI viruses, likely through a phenomenon called “viral interference.” 1-4

A negative viral interference is observed when a virus that has already infected a host makes that host resistant to infection by the second virus (isn’t that fascinating?). Although there a lot of virus, host and environmental variables that affect infection risk, potential mechanisms for this interference include a rapid and robust innate immune response to the first virus such as through upregulation of interferon (IFN) production which can protect against unrelated viruses, thereby creating a temporary “antiviral state.” 1-4

A negative viral interference has been shown between influenza-A virus (IAV) and SARS-CoV-2 by a cool 2024 study using the air-liquid interface culture model of the differentiated human airway epithelium. 4 Replicating IAV induced a robust interferon response and suppressed SARS-CoV-2 replication in both sequential and simultaneous infections. In contrast, SARS-CoV-2 did not demonstrate significant viral interference with IAV.  The researchers took their experiment a step further and found that oseltamivir (Tamiflu), an anti-IAV agent, restored SARS-CoV-2 replication with IAV coinfection by reducing induction of IFN!

One explanation for the inability of SARS-CoV-2 to interfere with the production of influenza virus is its slower induction of IFN stimulating genes likely due to its more effective mechanisms of antagonizing the IFN response with infected cells.4 Another explanation is that SARS-CoV-2 has a slower growth rate than IAV, making it more susceptible to being “outgunned” by faster growing viruses. Some strains of IAV may also cause more damage to the epithelial cells than SARS-CoV-2 thus reducing the number of host cells available for SARs-CoV-2 infection.2 Last, secreted IFNs (eg, IFN λ) can also bind to receptors present at the surface of infected and neighboring state blocking the second virus from infecting the host.1

So, it looks like competition among living forms in this world also applies to the world of viruses!

Bonus Pearl: Did you know that the concept of viral interference was first described in the 1960s following observation that oral administration of live enterovirus vaccines decreased detection of several unrelated respiratory viruses such as influenza virus, RSV and human adenovirus?1

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

References

  1. Piret J, Bolvin G. Viral interference between respiratory viruses. Emerg Infect Dis 2022;28:273-280. Viral Interference between Respiratory Viruses – PubMed
  2. Gilbert-Girard S, Piret J, Carbonneau J, et al. Viral interference between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and influenza A viruses. PLOS Pathogens 2024;20(7):e1012017. Viral interference between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and influenza A viruses – PubMed
  3. Kaaijk P, Swaans N, Nicolaie AM, et al. Contribution of influenza viruses, other respiratory viruses and viral co-infections to influenza-like illness in older adults. Viruses 2022;14, 797. Contribution of Influenza Viruses, Other Respiratory Viruses and Viral Co-Infections to Influenza-like Illness in Older Adults – PubMed
  4. Cheemarla NR, Watkins TA, Mihaylova VT, et al. Viral interference during influenza A-SARS-CoV-2 coinfection of the human airway epithelium and reversal by oseltamivir. J Infect Dis 2024;229:1430-4. Viral Interference During Influenza A-SARS-CoV-2 Coinfection of the Human Airway Epithelium and Reversal by Oseltamivir – PubMed

Disclosures/Disclaimers: The listed questions and answers are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of Mercy Hospital-St. Louis, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University, their affiliate academic healthcare centers, or its contributors. Although every effort has been made to provide accurate information, the author is far from being perfect. The reader is urged to verify the content of the material with other sources as deemed appropriate and exercise clinical judgment in the interpretation and application of the information provided herein. No responsibility for an adverse outcome or guarantees for a favorable clinical result is assumed by the author. Thank you!

 

 

Is it just my imagination or are Covid-19 cases going down as influenza cases are surging out of control during this flu season?

Is there a connection between Sjögren’s syndrome and hearing loss?

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , Leave a comment

While Sjögren’s syndrome (SS) is well known to cause dry eyes, mouth, skin and nose (“sicca”), its association with hearing loss is often underrecognized by patients and clinicians.  In fact, hearing loss has been reported in as many as one-third or more of patients with SS.1-4

A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis of 11 observational studies found a 52% pooled prevalence of any type of hearing loss in SS patients (mean age 52 years). Even after excluding studies with moderate (vs low) publication bias, the prevalence remained high (37%).1  A subgroup analysis based on sensorineural, conductive and mixed types of hearing loss (irrespective of severity) found a prevalence of 43%, 5% and 2%, respectively, among SS patients.

A 2020 cross-sectional study involving 30 patients with SS and polyneuropathy undergoing auditory function testing (by pure tone audiometry, Freiburg speech comprehension audiometry, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions and brainstem evoked response audiometry) found hearing loss by pure tone audiometry in 33% of patients with severity ranging from mild (in 60%) to severe (in 10%).2 Overall 80% of patients showed pathological test results on audiometric testing. Interestingly, in those with hearing loss on pure tone audiometry, 80% had asymmetric results.

A potential mechanism for sensorineural hearing loss in SS is the involvement of central nervous system. Of note, other autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus have also been associated with hearing loss, possibly related to the vasculitis of vasa nervorum or vasa vasorum.1 Indeed, immunosuppressants such as corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil have been used in the treatment of sensorineural hearing loss associated with autoimmune disorders. Dryness of Eustachian tube has been suggested as risk factor for the development of conductive hearing loss.1

Bonus Pearl: Did you know that SS is the second most common autoimmune rheumatic disease affecting an estimated 4 million cases in the USA alone?3

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

References

  1. V, PartalidouS, Siolos P, et al. Prevalence of hearing loss in patients with Sjögren syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatology 2023;43:233-44. Prevalence of hearing loss in patients with Sjögren syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis – PubMed (nih.gov)
  2. Seeliger T, Bonig L, Witte T, et al. Hearing dysfunction in patients with Neuro-sjögren: a cross-sectional study. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:1069. Hearing dysfunction in patients with Neuro-Sjögren: a cross-sectional study – PubMed (nih.gov)
  3. Yang TH, Xirasagar S, Cheng YF, et al. Increased prevalence of hearing loss, tinnitus and sudden deafness among patients with Sjögren’s syndrome. RMD Open 2024;10:e003308. Increased prevalence of hearing loss, tinnitus and sudden deafness among patients with Sjögren’s syndrome – PubMed (nih.gov)
  4. Kim KS, Kim HS. Successful treatment of sensorineural hearing loss in Sjögren’s syndrome with corticosteroid. Korean J Intern Med 2016;31:612-615. Successful treatmenParaschou t of sensorineural hearing loss in Sjögren’s syndrome with corticosteroid – PubMed (nih.gov)

 

Disclosures/Disclaimers: The listed questions and answers are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of Mercy Hospital-St. Louis, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University, their affiliate academic healthcare centers, or its contributors. Although every effort has been made to provide accurate information, the author is far from being perfect. The reader is urged to verify the content of the material with other sources as deemed appropriate and exercise clinical judgment in the interpretation and application of the information provided herein. No responsibility for an adverse outcome or guarantees for a favorable clinical result is assumed by the author. Thank you!

Is there a connection between Sjögren’s syndrome and hearing loss?

How common is hyponatremia in patients with Covid-19 and what’s its significance?  

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Hyponatremia has been reported between 20% and 35% of patients hospitalized for Covid-19, 1-5 with low serum sodium levels on admission often associated with progression to severe illness, mechanical ventilation, increased length of stay and death.1,2,4,5

A 2023 retrospective multicenter study involving over 2,600 hospitalized Covid-19 patients (between February 2020 and August 2022) found hyponatremia in 34.2%: Mild (Na 131-134 mmol/L) 25.1%, moderate (Na 126-130 mmol/L) 7.5% and severe (<126 mmol/L) 1.8%.3 There was a significant association between male sex at birth, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, immunosuppressives, thiazide diuretics and hyponatremia.3

Similarly, another retrospective study of hospitalized Covid-19 patients found an association between hyponatremia and several common chronic diseases, such as diabetes, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, chronic liver disease and chronic kidney disease.4 It’s important to note that since older age has also been found to be a risk factor for hyponatremia in Covid-19, the independent contribution of these conditions to hyponatremia is unclear.3

As with many other infectious diseases, the mechanism of hyponatremia in patients with Covid-19 likely has multiple causes, including hypovolemia, syndrome of inappropriate anti-diuretic hormone secretion (SIADH), diuretic use and corticosteroid deficiency, particularly in the critically ill. 1-4  

Interestingly, a study performed early in the pandemic (March 2020) found that the majority (57%)  of hospitalized Covid-19 patients with hyponatremic were euvolemic and that the administration of isotonic saline to such patients was independently associated with increased hospital mortality (cause unclear).2 The authors suggested closer attention to the volume status of Covid-19 patients with hyponatremia (eg, through closer attention to the jugular venous pressure on physical exam) before considering treatment with isotonic saline.

Last, Covid-19 may be associated with hyponatremia during the post-discharge period as well.  An intriguing 2024 study found nearly 25% of patients with Covid-19 developed hyponatremia (<135 mmol/L) during the 1-year follow-up period after discharge with most not reported to have hyponatremia during their index hospitalization.5 In the same study, hyponatremia was associated with older age, male sex, diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, previous invasive ventilatory support and increased rate of readmission.5

Bonus Pearl: Did you know that there is an inverse relationship between interleukin-6, a key pro-inflammatory cytokine, and plasma sodium levels in Covid-19 and that this association may be stronger than that of other viral or bacterial respiratory infections?2  

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

 

References

  1. Ayus JC, Klantar-Zadeh K, Tantisattamo E, et al. Is hyponatremia a novel marker of inflammation in patients with Covid-19? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2023;38:1921-24. Is hyponatremia a novel marker of inflammation in patients with COVID-19? – PubMed (nih.gov)
  2. Pazos-Guerra M, Ruiz-Sanchez JG, Perez-Candel X, et al. Inappropriate therapy of euvolemic hyponatremia, the most frequent type of hyponatremia in SARS-CoV-2 infection, is associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 patients. Front Endocrinol 2023; 14:1227058. Inappropriate therapy of euvolemic hyponatremia, the most frequent type of hyponatremia in SARS-CoV-2 infection, is associated with increased mortality in COVID-19 patients – PubMed (nih.gov)
  3. De Haan L, ten Wolde, Beudel M, et al. What is the aetiology of dynatreaemia in COVID-19 and how is this related to outcomes in patients admitted during earlier and later COVID-19 waves? A multicentre, restrospective observational study in 11 Dutch hospitals. BMJ Open 2023;13:e075232. Original research: What is the aetiology of dysnatraemia in COVID-19 and how is this related to outcomes in patients admitted during earlier and later COVID-19 waves? A multicentre, retrospective observational study in 11 Dutch hospitals – PMC (nih.gov)
  4. Rehman F, Rehan ST, Rind BJ, et al. Hyponatremia causing factors and its association with disease severity and length of stay in Covid-19 patients: A retrospective study from tertiary care hospital. Medicine 2023; 102:45(e35920) Hyponatremia causing factors and its association with disease severity and length of stay in COVID-19 patients: A retrospective study from tertiary care hospital – PubMed (nih.gov)
  5. Biagetti B, Sanchez-Montalva A, Puig-Perez A, et al. Hyponatremia after COVID-19 is frequent in the first year and increases re-admissions. Scientific Reports 2024:14:595. Hyponatremia after COVID-19 is frequent in the first year and increases re-admissions – PubMed (nih.gov)

 

Disclosures/Disclaimers: The listed questions and answers are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of Mercy Hospital-St. Louis, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University, their affiliate academic healthcare centers, or its contributors. Although every effort has been made to provide accurate information, the author is far from being perfect. The reader is urged to verify the content of the material with other sources as deemed appropriate and exercise clinical judgment in the interpretation and application of the information provided herein. No responsibility for an adverse outcome or guarantees for a favorable clinical result is assumed by the author. Thank you!

How common is hyponatremia in patients with Covid-19 and what’s its significance?  

My patient with Covid-19-related generalized weakness has rhabdomyolysis. How common is rhabdomyolysis in Covid-19?

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Covid-19-associated rhabdomyolysis has been reported since the early years of the pandemic with an overall prevalence ranging from 4%-20% among hospitalized patients and nearly 50% in ICU patients.1-5

In a 2023 scoping review of Covid-19-associated rhabdomyolysis involving 117 cases (January 2020-July 2022),1 68.4% had at least one reported non-Covid-19 risk factor (excluding hypoxemia), including age 65 years or older, metabolic syndrome features, hypothyroidism, previous rhabdomyolysis, hemoglobinopathy, trauma/compression or selected rhabdomyolysis-associated medications.  Presenting symptoms did not always include myalgias or weakness with some patients only presenting with fever, back pain, respiratory symptoms, or fatigue. Mortality was high (32% and 21% in those with or without other risk factors, respectively).  Routine creatine kinase (CK) testing was suggested for hospitalized patients with a low threshold for testing outpatients with Covid-19.

A 2024 cross-sectional study involving hospitalized Covid-19-patients (March 2020-March 2021) reported the following independent factors for concurrent rhabdomyolysis: male gender, dyspnea, hyponatremia, myalgia, elevated D-dimer, aspartate transaminase-AST (3x higher than normal) and platelet count >450,000 (cells/L).2 In the same study, myalgia was reported in only 30% of patients with rhabdomyolysis.   

Potential mechanisms explaining the association between Covid-19 and rhabdomyolysis include hypoxemia, viral myositis (either directly or immune-mediated), viral-induced mitochondrial dysfunction, cytokine storm, hypovolemia and Covid-related coagulopathies.1,2,4

Bonus Pearl: Did you know that although the 3 most common symptoms of patients with rhabdomyolysis are myalgias, muscle weakness and dark urine, the triad is present in only 10% of patients? 6

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

 

References

  1. Preger A, Wei R, Berg B, et al. Covid-19-associated rhabomyolysis: A scoping review. Intern J Infect Dis 2023:136:115-126. COVID-19-associated rhabdomyolysis: A scoping review – PubMed (nih.gov)
  2. Hashemi B, Farhangi N, Toloul A, et al. Prevalence and predictive factors of rhabydomyolysis in Covid-19 patients: A cross-sectional study. Indian J of Nephrol 2024;34:144-48. Prevalence and Predictive Factors of Rhabdomyolysis in COVID-19 Patients: A Cross-sectional Study – PubMed (nih.gov)
  3. Samardzic T, Muradashvill T, Guirguis S, et al. Relationship between rhabdomyolysis and SARS-CoV-2 disease severity. Cureus 16:e53029 (January 27, 2024). Relationship Between Rhabdomyolysis and SARS-CoV-2 Disease Severity – PubMed (nih.gov)
  4. Haroun MW, Dielev V, Kang J, et al. Rhabdomyolysis in Covid-19 patients: A retrospective observational study. Cureus 13:e12552. Rhabdomyolysis in COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study – PubMed (nih.gov)
  5. Albaba I, Chopra A, Al-Tarbsheh AH, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of rhabdomyolysis in hospitalized patients with Covid-19 infection. Cureus 13:e19802. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Rhabdomyolysis in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 Infection – PubMed (nih.gov)
  6. Lu W, Li X, You W, et al. Rhabdomyolysis in a patient with end-stage renal disease and SARS-CoV-2 infection: A case report. Medicine 2023;102:48(e36360). Rhabdomyolysis in a patient with end-stage renal disease and SARS-CoV-2 infection: A case report – PMC (nih.gov)

 

Disclosures/Disclaimers: The listed questions and answers are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of Mercy Hospital-St. Louis, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University, their affiliate academic healthcare centers, or its contributors. Although every effort has been made to provide accurate information, the author is far from being perfect. The reader is urged to verify the content of the material with other sources as deemed appropriate and exercise clinical judgment in the interpretation and application of the information provided herein. No responsibility for an adverse outcome or guarantees for a favorable clinical result is assumed by the author. Thank you!

 

My patient with Covid-19-related generalized weakness has rhabdomyolysis. How common is rhabdomyolysis in Covid-19?

What’s the significance of atrial fibrillation in my patient with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)?

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , Leave a comment

Although HFpEF alone may be associated with high pulmonary artery pressures, coexisting atrial fibrillation (AF) further increases the risk of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction independent from pulmonary artery pressures.1

A 2018 observational cohort study involving patients with symptomatic HFpEF (LVEF≥45%) found a significantly higher rate of RV dysfunction among those with current AF (63%) than those without a history of AF (20%) vs earlier AF but in normal sinus rhythm at the time of assessment (43%) (P=0.001).1 What’s fascinating is that AF was associated with RV dysfunction (O.R. 4.7 [95% C.I. 1.8-12.1]) even when adjusted for the mean pulmonary artery pressure.  

Another intriguing finding of the study was that earlier AF patients who were in normal sinus rhythm at the time of the study, tended to have more RV dysfunction that those who did not have a history of AF (O.R.3.1 [0.8-11.6], P=0.09).  These findings suggest that factors other than heart rhythm play a role in the development of RV remodeling in patients with HFpEF and AF. Several other studies support the strong association between AF and RV dysfunction in HFpEF.2-5  

What are some ramifications of AF-associated RV dysfunction in HFpEF? For one, the presence of RV dysfunction in heart failure (HFpEF or HFrEF) has been strongly associated with higher all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalization.2,4 Another is a potential explanation for why some patients with heart failure and AF have disproportionate amount of lower extremity edema compared to the severity of their pulmonary edema.  Could coexisting RV dysfunction be contributing?

Bonus Pearl: Did you know that 65%-73% of patients with HFpEF and RV dysfunction have AF vs 31%-53% of those with HFpEF without RV dysfunction?1  

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

References

  1. Gorter TM, Van Melle JP, Rienstra M, et al. Right hert dysfunction in heart failue with preserved ejection fraction: the impact of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiac Fail 2018;24:177-185. Right Heart Dysfunction in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: The Impact of Atrial Fibrillation – PubMed (nih.gov)
  2. Bosch L, Lam CSP, Gong L, et al. Right ventricular dysfunction in left-sided heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 2017;19:1664-71. Right ventricular dysfunction in left-sided heart failure with preserved versus reduced ejection fraction – PubMed (nih.gov)
  3. Melenovsky V, Hwang SJ, Lin G, et al. Right heart dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J 2014;35:3452-62. Right heart dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction – PubMed (nih.gov)
  4. Mohammed SF, Hussain I, Abou Ezzeddine OF, et al. Right ventricular function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a community-based study. Circulation 2014;130:2310-20. Right ventricular function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a community-based study – PubMed (nih.gov)
  5. Ghio S, Guazzi M, Scardovi AB, et al. Different correlates but similar prognostic implications for right ventricular dysfunction in heart failure patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 2016;19:873-9. Different correlates but similar prognostic implications for right ventricular dysfunction in heart failure patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction – PubMed (nih.gov)

Disclosures/Disclaimers: The listed questions and answers are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of Mercy Hospital-St. Louis, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University, their affiliate academic healthcare centers, or its contributors. Although every effort has been made to provide accurate information, the author is far from being perfect. The reader is urged to verify the content of the material with other sources as deemed appropriate and exercise clinical judgment in the interpretation and application of the information provided herein. No responsibility for an adverse outcome or guarantees for a favorable clinical result is assumed by the author. Thank you!

 

What’s the significance of atrial fibrillation in my patient with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)?

How should I generally go about treating my non-ICU hospitalized patient with newly diagnosed Covid-19 and who doesn’t require more than conventional O2?

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Much of the management of Covid-19 hospitalized patients who don’t require ICU care and need no more than conventional 02 (ie, high-flow or mechanical/non-mechanical ventilatory support) depends on the severity of their disease: “mild/moderate” (eg, SpO2≥94% on room air) vs “severe” (eg, Sp02<94% on room air) disease; respiration rate ≥30/min and lung infiltrates on chest radiograph>50% may also be considered, but I personally find these parameters less reliable.  Generally, patients hospitalized with Covid-19-related symptoms (respiratory or otherwise) require specific treatment to keep them from progressing or succumbing to their disease (see Figure below). 1-5

In patients with mild/moderate Covid-19, the first step is to determine whether they are at low risk (ie, NO risk factors) or high risk (ie, ≥1 risk factors) of progression to severe disease.  Recall that there are numerous risk factors for progression, including age (eg, ≥50 y) and many comorbidities, such as diabetes, chronic kidney disease, obesity, smoking (current or former), disability (eg, wheelchair dependence), and mental health disorders (eg, depression), just to name a few.1 If your patient with mild/moderate Covid-19 has ANY Covid-related symptoms and ANY risk factors for progression, you should strongly consider IV remdesivir. If your patient’s admission has nothing to do with Covid-19 but qualify for anti-Covid treatment, an oral anti-viral regimen (eg, nirmatrelvir-ritonavir [Paxlovid]) used for ambulatory patients may also be considered (see related pearl on P4P). If your patient has NO risk factors for progression to severe disease, symptomatic treatment is all that’s needed.

If your patient has severe disease but no need for 02 supplementation, IV remdesivir and prophylactic heparin (either fractionated [eg, enoxaparin] or unfractionated) should be considered; no need for dexamethasone or systemic steroids in this situation.

If your patient has severe Covid-19 and needs supplemental 02, you should consider initiation of remdesivir, dexamethasone and, at the minimum, prophylactic anticoagulation with either a fractionated or unfractionated heparin product as soon as possible.  Use of therapeutic anticoagulation in this setting (ie, outside of ICU) is controversial with NIH guidelines recommending therapeutic heparin for those with elevated D-dimer without increased bleeding risk (CIIa, “weak” with moderate supportive evidence).2,6,7  You may also be able to forgo systemic steroids in your patient with minimal 02 requirement (ie, 1-2 L) per NIH, particularly if immunocompromised, as hypoxia in such patients may be more related to viral infection itself and not significant inflammatory reaction.

If your patient with severe Covid-19 gets progressively worse requiring high-flow oxygen or non-invasive ventilation outside of ICU, you should consider adding baricitinib as a first line immunomodulator (tocilizumab or others in NIH guidelines as an alternative)2 in patients who are not already immunocompromised or do not already have and are not at high risk of secondary infections.

The duration of remdesivir treatment in hospitalized patients is usually 5 days (or until discharge) for severe Covid-19, and 3 days for those with mild/moderate disease. The ultimate duration should be individualized in patients at risk of ongoing viral replication.  One retrospective study in immunocompromised patients hospitalized for Covid-19 found remdesivir to be effective in reducing hospitalization and mortality when initiated within 2 days of hospitalization and given for a median of 5 days, even among those not requiring 02 supplementation or requiring only low flow 02.

Couple more things to keep in mind when managing severe Covid-19. When indicated, remdesivir should be given ideally as early as possible and no later than 10 days after onset of symptoms and dexamethasone should be given for up to 10 days or until discharge.  Anticoagulation, prophylactic or therapeutic, should only be prescribed in the absence of any contraindications for bleeding (see Figure footnote) and continued until discharge for no more than 14 days total.

As with all drugs, please make sure you are thoroughly familiar with the dosing, adverse effects and contraindications to above-referenced medications before prescribing them.

Figure. Management of SARS-CoV-2 positive hospitalized patients requiring no or only conventional 02 due to Covid-19

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

 

References

  1. CDC. Interim Clinical Considerations for COVID-19 Treatment in Outpatients | CDC. Accessed Feb 1, 2024
  2. NIH. Clinical Spectrum | COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines (nih.gov). Accessed Feb 1, 2024
  3. Uptodate. Coived-19 management in hospitalized patients. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/covid-19-management-in-hospitalized-adults. Accessed Feb 5, 2024.
  4. Bash K, Sacha G, Latifi M. Covid-19: A management update. Clev Clin J Med 2023;90:677-683. https://www.ccjm.org/content/90/11/677
  5. Mozaffari E, Chandak A, Gottlieb RL, et al. Remdesivir reduced mortality in immunocompromised patients hospitalized for Covid-19 across variant waves: Findings from routine clinical practice. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 77;1626-34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37556727/
  6. Merz LE, Fogerty AE. The conundrum of anticoagulation for hospitalized patient with Covid-19. NEJM Evidence 2023;2 (2).  https://evidence.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/EVIDe2200329
  7. ATTACC, CTIV-4a, REMAP-CAP Investigators. Therapeutic anticoagulation with heparin in noncritically patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:790-802. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34351721/

Disclosures/Disclaimers: The listed questions and answers are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of Mercy Hospital-St. Louis, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University, their affiliate academic healthcare centers, or its contributors. Although every effort has been made to provide accurate information, the author is far from being perfect. The reader is urged to verify the content of the material with other sources as deemed appropriate and exercise clinical judgment in the interpretation and application of the information provided herein. No responsibility for an adverse outcome or guarantees for a favorable clinical result is assumed by the author. Thank you!

How should I generally go about treating my non-ICU hospitalized patient with newly diagnosed Covid-19 and who doesn’t require more than conventional O2?

When should I consider treating my adult ambulatory patient with newly diagnosed Covid-19 with an antiviral drug?

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , 1 Comment

You should seriously consider prescribing an antiviral agent either oral nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) (within 5 days of onset of symptoms) or IV remdesivir (within 7 days of onset of symptoms) in all your ambulatory patients with mild/moderate Covid-19 at high risk of progression (ie, ≥1 risk factors) to severe disease (Figure). 1-3 Both of these drugs reduce hospitalization and mortality from Covid-19 by over 85%!1 Oral molnupiravir may be prescribed as a second-line agent (within 5 days of onset of symptoms), if neither Paxlovid or remdesivir is an option and the patient is not pregnant. There is no indication for the use of  dexamethasone or systemic steroids in the treatment of Covid-19 in ambulatory settings. As with all drugs, you should be familiar with adverse-effects and contraindications of these anti-viral agents before prescribing them. 

Couple of questions to ask when managing a patient with newly diagnosed Covid-19 in ambulatory setting:

  1. Does your patient truly have mild/moderate disease (eg, Sp02 on room air ≥94% on room air and not tachypneic) or severe disease (eg, Sp02 on room air <94%)?4 If severe disease is likely, you should refer your patient to a hospital for evaluation and treatment as soon as possible. If your patient is not symptomatic from Covid-19, no antiviral treatment is indicated. 
  2. Once you decide your patient has mild/moderate disease and doesn’t need to go to hospital, ask whether your patient has any risk factor associated with progression to severe Covid-19.2 Recall that there are numerous risk factors, including age over 50 and many physical disabilities, smoking (current or former) and mental health disorders, such as depression, ADHD, autism and depression that may be present even in the younger population.2
    • In the absence of any risk factor for progression, no antiviral therapy is indicated.

In the presence of 1 or more risk factors for progression or contraindications, you should consider initiation of Paxlovid x 5 days, if within 5 days of onset of Covid-19 symptoms or IV remdesivir x 3 days, if within 7 days of onset of Covid-19 symptoms.  

  • Remember that although Paxlovid may potentially interact with numerous drugs, fewer such drugs are absolutely contraindicated. Convenient online resources are available to help you decide if your patient can still receive Paxlovid safely.
  • Also don’t forget that remdesivir can now be given without dosage adjustment in renal insufficiency, including those on dialysis. 

If for some reason neither Paxlovid nor remdesivir is an option, oral molnupiravir can be considered with some caveats, including recommendations against its use during pregnancy and use of effective contraception during and following treatment in people who engage in sexual activity that may result in conception. 

Irrespective of treatment, it is prudent to monitor for any deterioration of sp02 at home when managing patients with mild/moderate Covid-19.  

Bonus pearl: Did you know that despite its high efficacy (89% reduction in hospitalization and death) against Covid-19,1,5 Paxlovid is severely underutilized in the outpatient setting with fewer than 25% of eligible patients with Covid-19 receiving it?6

Figure: Covid-19 management in ambulatory adult patients

 

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

 

References

  1. Rubin R. Paxlovid Is Effective but Underused—Here’s What the Latest Research Says About Rebound and More | Infectious Diseases | JAMA | JAMA Network Published online January 31, 2024. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.28254
  2. Interim Clinical Considerations for COVID-19 Treatment in Outpatients | CDC. Accessed Feb 1, 2024
  3. Molnupiravir | COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines (nih.gov). Accessed Feb 1, 2024.
  4. Clinical Spectrum | COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines (nih.gov). Accessed Feb 1, 2024
  5. Appaneal HJ, LaPlante KL, Lopes VV, et al. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir utilization for the treatment of non-hospitalized adults with Covid-10 in the National Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System. Infectious Diseases and Therapy 204;13:155-172. Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Utilization for the Treatment of Non-hospitalized Adults with COVID-19 in the National Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System | Infectious Diseases and Therapy (springer.com)
  6. Hammond J, Leister-Tebbe H, Gardner A, et al. Oral Nirmatrelvir for high-risk, nonhospitalized adults with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2022; 386:397-408. Oral Nirmatrelvir for High-Risk, Nonhospitalized Adults with Covid-19 – PubMed (nih.gov)

 

Disclosures/Disclaimers: The listed questions and answers are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of Mercy Hospital-St. Louis, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University, their affiliate academic healthcare centers, or its contributors. Although every effort has been made to provide accurate information, the author is far from being perfect. The reader is urged to verify the content of the material with other sources as deemed appropriate and exercise clinical judgment in the interpretation and application of the information provided herein. No responsibility for an adverse outcome or guarantees for a favorable clinical result is assumed by the author. Thank you!

 

 

When should I consider treating my adult ambulatory patient with newly diagnosed Covid-19 with an antiviral drug?

What are the proven benefits and side effects of testosterone therapy in my elderly male patient with hypogonadism?

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

The benefits and side-effects of testosterone therapy (TTh) in male hypogonadism, a common condition among elderly men, have been explored in several trials, demonstrating variable health benefits without significant side effects.1-4

A large 2016 randomized placebo-controlled trial of testosterone replacement for one year in elderly men found that TTh modestly improves muscle mass and strength (by 5%) without significant reduction in falls or frailty.1 This study also showed significant improvement in sexual desire and erectile dysfunction, but the effect of TTh on erections was weaker than that of phosphodiesterase inhibitors. Of interest, TTh did not improve fatigue in this study.1 This is important because lack of energy is probably the commonest complaint by men in ambulatory setting requesting that a serum testosterone level be checked.

Interestingly, in one study, cognition was not improved by TTh.2 Additionally, although TTh has been shown to improve bone density,3  it is not known if it has any impact on the risk of fractures due to lack of proper studies.  Hence, TTh should not be considered for treatment of osteoporosis at this time.  

TTh has been shown to be associated with a rise in hemoglobin by ~1 g/dl.4 However, some men may develop polycythemia, especially if they achieve supranormal levels of serum testosterone with therapy. Testosterone and hemoglobin concentrations should be monitored during TTh.3

Although there have been concerns about risks of cardiovascular events and prostate cancer with TTh, a recent randomized placebo controlled cardiovascular trial showed no effect of TTh on the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events.4 TTh also does not appear to increase the risk of prostate cancer in the short term (up to 3 years), but long- term prospective trials have not yet been conducted to exclude this possibility.3

Feel free to use the above summary while discussing the pros and cons of TTh with your patients.

Bonus Pearl: Did you know that, according to the Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline,3 in men with symptoms and signs consistent with testosterone deficiency, measuring fasting morning total testosterone concentrations followed by repeat testing for confirmation is recommended.  In men whose total testosterone is near the lower limit of normal or who have condition that alters sex hormone binding globulin, a free testosterone concentration using either equilibrium dialysis or estimating it using an accurate formula is recommended. 3

Contributed by Sandeep Dhindsa, MD, Director, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, St. Louis University Medical School, St. Louis, Missouri

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

References

  1. Snyder PJ, Bhasin S, Cunningham GR, et al. Effects of testosterone treatment in older Men. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(7):611-24. Epub 2016/02/18. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506119. PubMed PMID: 26886521.
  2. Snyder PJ, Bhasin S, Cunningham GR, et al. Lessons from the testosterone trials. Endocr Rev. 2018;39(3):369-86. Epub 2018/03/10. doi: 10.1210/er.2017-00234. PubMed PMID: 29522088; PMCID: PMC6287281.
  3. Bhasin S, Brito JP, Cunningham GR, Hayes FJ, et al. Testosterone therapy in men with hypogonadism: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103(5):1715-44. Epub 2018/03/22. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-00229. PubMed PMID: 29562364.
  4. Lincoff AM, Bhasin S, Flevaris P, et al. Cardiovascular safety of testosterone-replacement therapy. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(2):107-17. Epub 2023/06/16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2215025. PubMed PMID: 37326322.

 

Disclosures/Disclaimers: The listed questions and answers are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of Mercy Hospital-St. Louis, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University, their affiliate academic healthcare centers, or its contributors. Although every effort has been made to provide accurate information, the author is far from being perfect. The reader is urged to verify the content of the material with other sources as deemed appropriate and exercise clinical judgment in the interpretation and application of the information provided herein. No responsibility for an adverse outcome or guarantees for a favorable clinical result is assumed by the author. Thank you!

What are the proven benefits and side effects of testosterone therapy in my elderly male patient with hypogonadism?

Can pleural effusions be reliably detected using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)?

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Absolutely. Though costophrenic blunting may not be seen on a PA or AP chest radiography until more than 200 mL of pleural effusion is present, as little as 20 mL of pleural fluid can be reliability detected with POCUS, with a sensitivity of 100% when more than 100 mL is present. Most pleural effusions will accumulate in the dependent areas within the chest cavity. Thus, in the usual semi-recumbent position used for POCUS, pleural effusion will accumulate above the diaphragm and below the lower lobe of the lungs.1,2

Few things to consider when evaluating for pleural effusion. 

  • Because evaluation for pleural effusions may require imaging depths of 10 to 20 cm, low frequency (preferably a phased array) transducer should be used.
  • Place the transducer in the posterior axillary line around the level of the diaphragm with the orientation marker positioned cephalad in the coronal plane (FIGURE 1).
  • Identify the diaphragm and use it as a point of reference to minimize mistakes such as labeling ascites as pleural effusion. Structures above the diaphragm (atelectatic lung, pleural effusion) will be shown on the left while structures below the diaphragm (abdominal organs, ascites) will be shown on the right side of the ultrasound display (FIGURE 2).
  • Keep in mind that freely flowing atelectatic lung tip (jellyfish sign) and spine shadows (spine sign) may be visible (VIDEO 1). Anechoic, free flowing pleural effusions are categorized as simple while homogeneously and heterogeneously echogenic effusions or those with septations are categorized as complex (VIDEO 2 and VIDEO 3). 2,3 
  • Smaller effusions may be seen as a small anechoic layer of fluid between the chest wall and the lung. If you use the M-mode, you will find that the lung moves towards or away from the chest wall in a wave like pattern (sinusoid sign) (VIDEO 4).1

Bonus Pearl: Did you know that you can estimate pleural effusion volume by using the following formula: Volume=16 x distance from mid lung base to the diaphragm (mm)? 4

Contributed by Woo Moon, D.O, Director, Hospitalist and Internal Medicine Residency Point-of-Care Ultrasound Programs, Mercy Hospital-St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

 

     Figure 1                                                         Figure 2

Figure 3

Video 1

 

Video 2

 

Video 3

 

Video 4

 

References

  1. Soni NJ, Arntfield R, Kory P. Point of Care Ultrasound. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2019.
  2. Soni NJ, Franco R, Velez MI, et al. Ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of pleural effusions. J Hosp Med 2015;10(12):811–6. Ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of pleural effusions – PubMed (nih.gov) 
  3. Yang PC, Luh KT, Chang DB, Wu HD, et al. Value of sonography in determining the nature of pleural effusion: analysis of 320 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;159(1):29–33.     Value of sonography in determining the nature of pleural effusion: analysis of 320 cases – PubMed (nih.gov)
  4. Usta E, Mustafi M, Ziemer G. Ultrasound estimation of volume of postoperative pleural effusion in cardiac surgery patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2010;10(2):204–7. Ultrasound estimation of volume of postoperative pleural effusion in cardiac surgery patients – PubMed (nih.gov).

Disclosures/Disclaimers: The listed questions and answers are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of Mercy Hospital-St. Louis, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University, their affiliate academic healthcare centers, or its contributors. Although every effort has been made to provide accurate information, the author is far from being perfect. The reader is urged to verify the content of the material with other sources as deemed appropriate and exercise clinical judgment in the interpretation and application of the information provided herein. No responsibility for an adverse outcome or guarantees for a favorable clinical result is assumed by the author. Thank you!

Can pleural effusions be reliably detected using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)?

Do proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reduce the risk of bleeding from lower gastrointestinal tract?

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

The short answer is “No”!  Although proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are effective in reducing the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleed (GIB) in high-risk patients, they do not protect against lower GIB. 1 In fact, their use has been associated with an increased risk of small bowel injury related to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and low-dose aspirin.2,3

A 2015 case-control study involving over 1,000 patients hospitalized for GIB found that although concomitant use of PPI in patients on NSAIDs, low-dose aspirin, other antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants was associated with a reduced risk of UGIB, it was not associated with reduced risk of lower GIB.  Interestingly, in this study, PPIs were associated with higher risk of lower GIB which might have been related to confounding factors and not necessarily a direct causal effect.4 Lack of an impact of PPIs on lower GIB among patients on aspirin or NSAIDS has also been supported by others. 5-7

The fact that PPIs don’t seem to reduce the risk of GIB distal to the duodenum should not be surprising given their primary mechanism of action through inhibition of acid production by gastric parietal cells. 8  What is perhaps more intriguing is how they may potentially increase the risk of small intestinal injury while still protecting the gastro-duodenum from NSAID-induced mucosal damage.

In a cool laboratory study involving rats, treatment with a PPI was associated with exacerbation of NSAID-induced intestinal ulceration and bleeding; by itself treatment with PPI was not associated with intestinal mucosa injury.9 Interestingly, in this study, a marked shifts in numbers and types of enteric bacteria with a significant reduction in jejunal Bifidobacteria spp was noted with PPI therapy. Restoration of small intestine Bifididobacteria during treatment with a PPI along with an NSAID prevented intestinal ulceration/bleeding. The investigators concluded that when used along with an NSAID, PPIs may cause small intestinal injury through alteration in the microbiome of the gut.  Fascinating!

Bonus Pearl: Did you know that the 2022 American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) clinical practice update on de-prescribing of PPIs lists several conditions for which acute/short term use of PPIs are NOT indicated, such as isolated lower GI symptomatology, acute nausea and vomiting not believed to be related to GERD/esophagitis, acute undifferentiated abdominal pain, and empiric treatment of laryngopharyngeal symptomatology? 10 

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

 

References

  1. Lue A, Lanas A. Proton pump inhibitor treatment and lower gastrointestinal bleeding: Balancing risks and benefits. World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:10477-10481. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5192259/#:~:text=PPIs%20do%20not%20prevent%20NSAID,and%20the%20risk%20of%20LGB.
  2. Endo H, Sakai E, Taniguchi L, et al. Risk factors for small-bowel mucosal breaks in chronic low-dose aspirin users: data from a prospective multicenter capsule endoscopy registry. Gastrointes Endosc 2014;80:826-34. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24830581/
  3. Washio E, Esaki M, Maehata Y, et al. Proton pump inhibitors increase incidence of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced small bowel injury: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14:809-815. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26538205/
  4. Lanas A, Carrera-Lasfuentes P, Arguedas Y, et al. Risk of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antiplatelet agents, or anticoagulants. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015;13:906-12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25460554/
  5. Nagata N, Niikura R, Aoki T, et al. Effect of proton-pump inhibitors on the risk of lower gastrointestinal bleeding associated with NSAIDs, aspirin, clopidogrel, and warfarin. J Gastroenterol 2015;50:1079-1086. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25700638/
  6. Garcia Rodriguez LA, Lanas A, Soriano-Gabarro M, et al. Effect of proton pump inhibitors on risks of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding among users of low-dose aspirin: A population-based observational study. J Clin Med 2020;9:928. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/4/928
  7. Casado Arroyo R, Polo-Tomas M, Roncales MP, et al. Lower GI bleeding is more common than upper among patients on dual antiplatelet therapy: long-term follow-up of a cohort of a patients commonly using PPI co-therapy. Heart 2012;98:718-723. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22523056/
  8. Engevik AC, Kaji I, Goldenring JR. The physiology of the gastric parietal cell. Physiol Rev 2020;100:573-602. The Physiology of the Gastric Parietal Cell – PMC (nih.gov)
  9. Wallace JL, Syer S, Denou E, et al. Proton pump inhibitors exacerbate NSAID-induced small intestinal injury by inducing dysbiosis. Gastroenterology 2011;141:1314-22. https://www.gastrojournal.org/action/showPdf?pii=S0016-5085%2811%2900926-7
  10. Targownik LE, Fisher DA, Saini SD. AGA clinical practice update on de-prescribing of proton pump inhibitors: expert review. Gastroenterology 2022;162:1334-1342. https://www.gastrojournal.org/article/S0016-5085(21)04083-X/fulltext

Disclosures/Disclaimers: The listed questions and answers are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of Mercy Hospital-St. Louis, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University, their affiliate academic healthcare centers, or its contributors. Although every effort has been made to provide accurate information, the author is far from being perfect. The reader is urged to verify the content of the material with other sources as deemed appropriate and exercise clinical judgment in the interpretation and application of the information provided herein. No responsibility for an adverse outcome or guarantees for a favorable clinical result is assumed by the author. Thank you!

Do proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reduce the risk of bleeding from lower gastrointestinal tract?