Sepsis

Should I treat my patient with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) with adjunctive corticosteroids?

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

It depends! You should consider ACs in immunocompetent patients with severe bacterial CAP in the absence of concurrent influenza, particularly in patients with a very high inflammatory response (eg, serum C-reactive protein [CRP] >150-200 mg/L). 1-13 In contrast, ACs is NOT recommended for patients with non-severe CAP.

Depending on the study, ACs in severe CAP has been associated with improvement in various patient outcomes, including reduced mortality, need for vasopressor or invasive mechanical ventilation, decrease in ICU stay and decrease in hospital length of stay.1-13 Significantly higher risk of hyperglycemia has been reported in the ACs group without demonstrable increase in the risk of upper GI bleed or hospital-acquired infections.2  

Which definition of severe CAP should we use when considering ACs? Unfortunately, it varies but a commonly cited definition is that proposed by the American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America (ATS/IDSA).9  When determining which patients may benefit from ACs, I favor a broader definition of severe CAP through modification of the ATS/IDSA criteria to include several other criteria used in major trials such as the seminal Community-Acquired Pneumonia Evaluation Corticosteroids (CAPE COD) study criteria and the Pneumonia Severity Index. 1-4   According to this “modified ATS/IDSA criteria”, severe CAP is likely in the presence of either one major criterion OR ≥3 minor criteria as detailed below.

Major criteria (1 needed):1. Septic shock with need for vasopressor; 2. Respiratory failure requiring invasive, non-invasive mechanical ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula; OR 3. Pneumonia severity index class IV or V.  Note: high-flow nasal cannula and PSI IV or V have been added to ATS/IDSA criteria

Minor criteria (3 needed):1. Respiratory rate ≥30/min; 2. Pa02/Fi02 ratio ≤250; 3. Multilobar infiltrates; 4. Confusion/disorientation; 5. BUN≥20 mg/dL; 6. Leukopenia (WBC<4,000/uL); 7. Thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 100,000/uL; 8. Hypothermia (core temp <96.8 ⁰ F, 36 ⁰ C); 9. Hypotension requiring aggressive fluid resuscitation.

In addition, a high inflammatory response based on CRP greater than 150-200 mg/L significantly increases the odds of a favorable outcome (eg, reduced mortality) in CAP when ACs is used.2,3,8 In fact, in a meta-analysis involving data-driven analysis of randomized trials, a significant reduction in mortality with ACs was observed only in those with CRP>204 mg/dL (6.1% vs 13%).8  In a subgroup analysis of CAPE COD study, mortality was significantly reduced only in patients with CRP>150 mg/L (risk difference -7.3 %).2  A 2015 study involving only patients with CRP>150 mg/L and meeting ATS/IDSA criteria for severe CAP or PSI class V, treatment failure (composite deterioration/invasive mechanical ventilation and death within 72 h) was significantly lower in the ACs group (13% vs 31%).3   

Collectively, in the absence of any contraindication to corticosteroids or concurrent influenza, the weight of the evidence supports ACs in select patients with severe CAP, particularly when associated with CRP>150 mg/L.  In contrast, for patients with non-severe CAP and presumed lower level of inflammation, the benefit of ACs may not outweigh its risks and is not recommended, unless there are other indications for their use (eg, COPD exacerbation).  For all other patients, including those without severe CAP but with high CRP levels as above or severe CAP with lower CRP levels, ACs should be considered on a case-by-case basis.

When indicated for severe CAP, based on the inclusion criteria used by various clinical trials, ACs should be started as soon as severe CAP is diagnosed, preferably within 24 h.2,13 As for the choice of ACs regimen, no study has proven the superiority of one particular regime vs others.1  The CAPE COD study used IV hydrocortisone 200 mg/day continuous infusion for 4-8 days with taper over total of 8-14 days.2 Some have suggested methylprednisolone 0.5 mg/kg IV q 12 h or “typical doses” of 40-80 mg/day IV methylprednisolone equivalent for 5-7 days.1,3 Yet others have suggested that hydrocortisone 100 mg IV or methylprednisolone 40 mg IV be given in the emergency department as an initial dose when severe CAP is diagnosed. 11 If IV hydrocortisone is selected, a pragmatic approach using 50 mg every 6 hours, similar to that suggested in the management of septic shock by the 2026 Guidelines by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign14 may also be reasonable.

 

Bonus Pearls:

  1. Did you know that despite ready availability of antibiotics, mortality from CAP in hospitalized patients remains high with nearly 50,000 people dying each year in the U.S. alone? top-pneumonia-facts.pdf
  2. Did you know that in addition to their immune modulating action, experimental studies have shown that corticosteroids may decrease global bacterial burden in lung tissue and lead to less extensive pneumonia in piglets15 and significant reduction in intracellular bacterial survival in human monocytes?16 Who would have guessed?  

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

 

References

  1. Chaudhuri D, Nei AM, Rochwerg B, et al. 2024 Focused update: Guidelines on use of corticosteroids in sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and community-acquired pneumonia. Crit Care Med 2024;52:e129-33. 2024 Focused Update: Guidelines on Use of… : Critical Care Medicine 
  2. Dequin P.-F, Meziani J.-P, Quenot T, et al. Hydrocortisone in severe community-acquire pneumonia. N Engl J Med 2023; 388: 1931-41. Hydrocortisone in Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia | New England Journal of Medicine 
  3. Torres A, Sibila O, Ferrer M, et al. Effect of corticosteroids on treatment failure among hospitalized patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia and high inflammatory response: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;313:677-86 .Effect of corticosteroids on treatment failure among hospitalized patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia and high inflammatory response: a randomized clinical trial – PubMed
  4. Metlay JP, Waterer GW. Time to treat severe community-acquired pneumonia with steroids? N Engl J Med 2023; 388:2001-2. Time to Treat Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia with Steroids? | New England Journal of Medicine
  5. Pitre Ty, Pauley E, Chaudhuri D, et al. Corticosteroids for adult patients hospitalized with non-viral community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Medicine 2025; 51:917-29. Corticosteroids for adult patients hospitalised with non-viral community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis | Intensive Care Medicine | Springer Nature Link
  6. Soumare A, Kapfer T, Botrel T, et al. Systemic corticosteroids, mortality, and infections in pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Ann Intern Med 2026; 179L67-80. Systemic Corticosteroids, Mortality, and Infections in Pneumonia and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis – PubMed
  7. Keisham B, Duhan S, Bajaj D, et al. Steroid therapy in community-acquired pneumonia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart & Lung 2026;79:102839. Steroid Therapy in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis – PubMed
  8. Smit JM, Van Der Zee PA, Stoff SCM, et al. Predicting benefit from adjuvant therapy with corticosteroids in community-acquired pneumonia: a data-driven analysis of randomized trials. Lancet Resp Med 2025;13:221-33. Predicting benefit from adjuvant therapy with corticosteroids in community-acquired pneumonia: a data-driven analysis of randomised trials – The Lancet Respiratory Medicine. 
  9. Jones BE, Ramirez JA, Oren E, et al. Diagnosis and management of community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Resp Crit Care 2026;212:24. Jones BE, Ramirez JA, Oren E, et al. Diagnosis and management of community-acquired pneumonia. Am J Resp Crit Care 2026;212:24. – Search
  10. Reyes LF, Morris AC, Serrano-Mayorga C, et al. Community-acquired pneumonia. Lancet 2025;406:2371-88. Community-acquired pneumonia – The Lancet
  11. Long B, Gottlieb M. 2025 guideline updates for community-acquired pneumonia diagnosis and management. Am J Emerg Med 2026;107:16-20. 2025 guideline updates for community-acquired pneumonia diagnosis and management – EM consulte
  12. Confalonleri M, Urbino R, Potena A, et al. Hydrocortisone infusion for severe community-acquired pneumonia: A preliminary randomized study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005;171:242-8. Hydrocortisone Infusion for Severe Community-acquired Pneumonia | American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine | Oxford Academic
  13. Pirracchio R, Venkatesh B, Legrand M. Low-dose corticosteroids for critically ill adults with severe pulmonary infections: A review. JAMA 2024;332:318-328.jama_pirracchio_2024_rv_240011_1721328820.09305 give steroids.pdf
  14. Prescott HC, Antonelli M, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026. Crit Care Med 2026;54:725-812. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International… : Critical Care Medicine
  15. Sibila O, Luna CM, Agusti C, et al. Effects of glucocorticoids in ventilated piglets with severe pneumonia. Eur Respir J 2008;32:1037-46. Effects of glucocorticoids in ventilated piglets with severe pneumonia | European Respiratory Society
  16. Meduri GU, Kananagat S, Bronze M, et al. Effects of methylprednisolone on intracellular bacterial growth. Clin Diag Lab Immunol 2001;8:1156-63.Effects of Methylprednisolone on Intracellular Bacterial Growth – PMC

Disclosures/Disclaimers: The listed questions and answers are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of Mercy Hospital-St. Louis, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University, their affiliate academic healthcare centers, or its contributors. Although every effort has been made to provide accurate information, the author is far from being perfect. The reader is urged to verify the content of the material with other sources as deemed appropriate and exercise clinical judgment in the interpretation and application of the information provided herein. No responsibility for an adverse outcome or guarantees for a favorable clinical result is assumed by the author. Thank you!

Should I treat my patient with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) with adjunctive corticosteroids?

“My patient with severe Crohn’s disease is found to have an elevated serum lipase without other supportive evidence of pancreatitis. What other sources of elevated lipase should I consider?” 

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Over 20 different conditions have been linked to elevated serum lipase levels or hyperlipasemia associated with conditions other than pancreatitis. The most common causes are sepsis and acute kidney injury, but less common causes include gastrointestinal bleeding, liver disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus, and inflammatory bowel disease.1   More specifically, up to 9% of patients with Crohn’s disease may have hyperlipasemia, often associated with a more extensive and active disease.2  

Recall that hyperlipasemia is one of the hallmarks of acute pancreatitis (serum lipase greater than 3-5x the upper limit of normal) but, as noted above, it is not 100% specific for this condition.  Although pancreatic tissue has a 50-to-100-fold greater lipase activity than other organs in the gastrointestinal tract,3 serum amylase may also be elevated in diseases involving salivary glands, stomach, heart, skeletal muscle, white and brown adipose tissue, and even the brain.1 This finding should come as no surprise since, as an enzyme, lipase metabolizes triglycerides into glycerol and free fatty acids and plays a key role in the metabolism and transport of lipids into peripheral tissues. 4   

Last, despite potential extra-pancreatic sources, serum lipase is still preferred over amylase in diagnosing pancreatitis due to its higher specificity and sensitivity. 5  

Bonus Pearl: Did you know that increased intracranial pressure, including intracerebral hemorrhage, edema, and tumors may also be associated with elevated serum lipase levels? 6 

Contributed by Charles Hurth, D.O., Mercy Hospital, St. Louis, Missouri

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

References: 

  1. Feher KE, Tornai D, Vitalis Z, Davida L, Sipeki N, Papp M. Non-pancreatic hyperlipasemia: A puzzling clinical entity. World J Gastroenterol. 2024 May 21;30(19):2538-2552. doi: 10.3748/v30.i19.2538. PMID: 38817657; PMCID: PMC11135416. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11135416/#B33  
  2. Heikius B, Niemelä S, Lehtola J, Karttunen TJ. Elevated pancreatic enzymes in inflammatory bowel disease are associated with extensive disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Apr;94(4):1062-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.x. PMID: 10201484. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10201484/ 
  3. Tetrault GA. Lipase activity in serum measured with Ektachem is often increased in nonpancreatic disorders. Clin Chem. 1991 Mar;37(3):447-51. PMID: 1706233. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1706233/
  4. Wang H, Eckel RH. Lipoprotein lipase in the brain and nervous system. Annu Rev Nutr. 2012 Aug 21;32:147-60. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071811-150703. Epub 2012 Apr 23. PMID: 22540257; PMCID: PMC4065112. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4065112/
  5. Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG, Sauer B, Yang A, Conwell DL, Yadlapati RH, Gardner TB. American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 1;119(3):419-437. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002645. Epub 2023 Nov 7. PMID: 38857482. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38857482/
  6. Larson GM, Koch S, O’Dorisio TM, Osadchey B, McGraw P, Richardson JD. Gastric response to severe head injury. Am J Surg. 1984 Jan;147(1):97-105. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(84)90041-2. PMID: 6691557. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6691557/

Disclosures/Disclaimers: The listed questions and answers are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of Mercy Hospital-St. Louis, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University, their affiliate academic healthcare centers, or its contributors. Although every effort has been made to provide accurate information, the author is far from being perfect. The reader is urged to verify the content of the material with other sources as deemed appropriate and exercise clinical judgment in the interpretation and application of the information provided herein. No responsibility for an adverse outcome or guarantees for a favorable clinical result is assumed by the author. Thank you!

“My patient with severe Crohn’s disease is found to have an elevated serum lipase without other supportive evidence of pancreatitis. What other sources of elevated lipase should I consider?” 

My elderly patient has a WBC count of 60,000 without obvious hematologic malignancy.  How likely is it that his leukocytosis is related to an infection?

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Although extremely high WBC count in the absence of myeloproliferative disease may be associated with solid tumors and other causes, infections are often the most common cause of leukemoid reaction (LR), including tuberculosis, Clostridiodes difficile colitis, shigellosis, salmonellosis, pneumonia, abscesses, as well as  parasitic infections (eg, malaria), fungal infections (mucormycosis), and viral diseases (eg, HIV, EBV, Chickungunya fever).1-4   

In a study of 173 hospitalized patients (mean age 69 y) with leukemoid reaction (defined in this study as WBC ≥30,000/µl), infection was the most common cause of LR (48%), followed by tissue ischemia/stress (28%), inflammation (eg, pancreatitis, diverticulitis without perforation) and obstetric diagnoses (7% each) and malignant tumor (5%).1 

In the same study, the most common infections were “sepsis”, pneumonia and urinary tract infections.  Bacteremia was documented in 13%, while Clostridiodes difficile toxin assay was positive in 7% of patients.  The highest WBC counts were observed in patients with either a positive blood culture or positive C. difficile toxin.  In-hospital mortality rate was very high at 62%.

Similarly, in a study involving 105 hospitalized patients, the most common cause was infection, followed by malignancy and other causes. 2 In a smaller study of 25 patients with “extreme” leukocytosis (defined as WBC ≥50,000/µl) infection was considered the cause in 52% and malignancy in 44% of patients; about one-third were bacteremic (eg, Pseudomonas sp, Streptococcus pneumoniae, E. coli).3

Bonus Pearl: Did you know that besides infections and malignancy, drugs (eg, corticosteroids, epinephrine) and ingestion of ethylene glycol have also been associated with LR? 1,3,4

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

References

  1. Potasman I, Grupper M. Leukemoid reaction:Spectrum and prognosis of 173 adult patients. Clin Infect Dis 2013;57:e177-81. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23994818/
  2. Portich JP, Faulhaber GAM. Leudemoid reaction: A 21st-century study. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31765058/
  3. Halkes CJM, Dijstelbloem HM, Eelman Rooda SJ, et al. Extreme leucocytosis: not always leukaemia. The Netherlands J Med 2007;65:248-51. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17656811/
  4. Kumar P, Charaniya R, Sahoo R, et al. Leukemoid reaction in Chickungunya fever. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:OD05-OD06. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4948452/

 

Disclosures: The listed questions and answers are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of Mercy Hospital-St. Louis or its affiliate healthcare centers. Although every effort has been made to provide accurate information, the author is far from being perfect. The reader is urged to verify the content of the material with other sources as deemed appropriate and exercise clinical judgment in the interpretation and application of the information provided herein. No responsibility for an adverse outcome or guarantees for a favorable clinical result is assumed by the author. Thank you!

My elderly patient has a WBC count of 60,000 without obvious hematologic malignancy.  How likely is it that his leukocytosis is related to an infection?

How does older people’s immune system place them at high risk of sepsis and death?

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Increased risk of sepsis and death from infectious causes among the elderly is a well-known phenomenon—particularly as witnessed in the Covid-19 era— and is in part due to 2 major age-related alterations of their immune system: 1. Defective T and B cell functions in response to acute infections; and 2. Once infection sets in, inadequate control of sepsis-induced pro-inflammatory response and its attendant procoagulant state. Interestingly, the essential elements of the innate immunity (eg, neutrophils, dendritic cells, complements) are generally spared from the effects of aging.1,2

Increased susceptibility of the elderly to acute infections is in part caused by poorer T helper cell function and suboptimal B cell humoral response to neoantigens. Despite this, serum levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6,TNF-alpha, and IFN-gamma are intact.  In fact, production of IL-6 and its duration of response is actually increased in the elderly.1,2

Poor control of the inflammatory state due to sepsis in older patients may be related to the difficulty in clearing a pathogen or dysfunction in the signaling by counter-regulatory cytokines, such as IL-10.2 Either way, unchecked inflammatory response is deleterious to the patient and is associated with increased risk of thrombosis and thromboembolism, multiorgan system failure, septic shock and death. 

Bonus Pearl: Did you know that even in the absence of infection, older people are more prone to thrombosis and thromboembolism , in part related to elevated plasma levels of fibrinogen, as well as factor VII, VIII, and IX, among others?2,3  

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

 References

  1. Ticinesi A, Lauretani F, Nouvenne A, et al. C-reactive protein (CRP) measurement in geriatric patients hospitalized for acute infection. Eur J Intern Med 2017;37:7-12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27594414/
  2. Opal SM, Girard TD, Ely EW. The immunopathogenesis of sepsis in elderly patients. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41: (Suppl 7) S504-12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16237654/
  3. Mari D, Coppola R, Provenzano R. Hemostasis factors and aging. Experimental Gerontology 2008;43:66-73. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0531556507001404?via%3Dihub

Disclosures: The listed questions and answers are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University, its affiliate academic healthcare centers, or its contributors. Although every effort has been made to provide accurate information, the author is far from being perfect. The reader is urged to verify the content of the material with other sources as deemed appropriate and exercise clinical judgment in the interpretation and application of the information provided herein. No responsibility for an adverse outcome or guarantees for a favorable clinical result is assumed by the author. Thank you!

 

How does older people’s immune system place them at high risk of sepsis and death?

Do statins have a role in treating novel Coronavirus infection, COVID-19?

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

There is currently no firm clinical evidence that statins improve the outcome of COVID-19. However, there are some theoretical reasons for believing that statins may have a role in the treatment of COVID-19.  That’s because beyond their cholesterol lowering action, statins may also have clinically relevant anti-inflammatory and antiviral (pleotropic) properties.  

Anti-inflammatory: Anti-inflammatory effect of statins is well known and is thought to occur through a variety of molecular pathways of the innate and adaptive immune systems as well as attenuation of several circulating proinflammatory cytokines.1 Although observational studies have suggested that statins lower hospitalization and mortality among outpatients hospitalized with infection, pneumonia or sepsis, several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have failed to show any mortality benefit among ICU patients with sepsis and ARDS treated with statins.2

In contrast, an RCT involving patients with sepsis (majority with pneumonia, mean CRP 195 mg/dL) reported significant reduction in progression to severe sepsis among statin-naïve patients  placed on atorvastatin 40 mg/day at the time of hospitalization.3 So, perhaps timing of statin therapy before florid sepsis and ARDS is an important factor.  

Some have suggested that statins may decrease the fatality rate of a related Coronavirus, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) virus, by blunting exuberant inflammatory response that may result in a fatal outcome. 4

Antiviral: Statins may also have antiviral properties, including activity against influenza, hepatitis C virus, Zika and dengue viruses.2,5 Whether statins have activity against coronaviruses such as the agent of COVID-19 is unclear at this time.

It’s interesting to note that cholesterol may have an important role in the membrane attachment, fusion and replication of many enveloped viruses, including influenza.5 Covid-19 is also an enveloped virus.

So what do we do? Based on the current data, it makes sense to continue statins in patients who have known clinical indications for their use and no obvious contraindications because of COVID-19 (eg. rhabdomyolysis).6 As for statin-naïve patients, particularly those in early stages of sepsis and increased risk of cardiovascular events, benefit may outweigh the risk.  Only proper clinical studies will give us more definitive answers.

Bonus Pearl: Did you know that lipids make up a major component of the envelope in enveloped viruses and that cholesterol makes up nearly one-half of total lipid and over 10% the total mass of influenza viruses?

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

References

  1. Tousoulis D, Psarros C, Demosthenous M, et al. Innate and adaptive inflammation as a therapeutic target in vascular diseae: The emerging role of statins. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:2491-2502. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109714011553?via%3Dihub
  2. Fedson DS. Treating the host response to emerging virus diseases: lessons learned from sepsis, pneumonia, influenza and Ebola. Ann Transl Med 2016;4:421. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5124618/pdf/atm-04-21-421.pdf
  3. Patel JM, Snaith C, Thickette DR. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of 40 mg/day of atorvastatin in reducing the severity of sepsis in ward patients (ASEPSIS Trial) Critical Care 2012;16:R231. https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/cc11895
  4. Espano E, Nam JH, Song EJ, et al. Lipophilic statins inhibit Zika virus production in Vero cells. Scientific Reports 2019;9:11461. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-47956-1
  5. Sun X, Whittaker GR. Role for influenza virus envelope cholesterol in virus entry and infection. J Virol 2003;77:12543-12551. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC262566/
  6. Virani SS. Is there a role for statin therapy in acute viral infections. Am Coll Cardiol March 18, 2020. https://www.acc.org/latest-in-cardiology/articles/2020/03/18/15/09/is-there-a-role-for-statin-therapy-in-acute-viral-infections-covid-19

Disclosures: The listed questions and answers are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University, its affiliate academic healthcare centers, or its contributors. Although every effort has been made to provide accurate information, the author is far from being perfect. The reader is urged to verify the content of the material with other sources as deemed appropriate and exercise clinical judgment in the interpretation and application of the information provided herein. No responsibility for an adverse outcome or guarantees for a favorable clinical result is assumed by the author. Thank you!

Do statins have a role in treating novel Coronavirus infection, COVID-19?

My patient with sepsis and bacteremia has an extremely high serum Creatine kinase (CK) level. Can his infection be causing rhabdomyolysis?

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

 Absolutely! Although trauma, toxins, exertion, and medications are often listed as common causes of rhabdomyolysis, infectious etiologies should not be overlooked as they may account for 5% to 30% or more of rhabdomyolysis cases (1,2).

Rhabdomyolysis tends to be associated with a variety of infections, often severe, involving the respiratory tract, as well as urinary tract, heart and meninges, and may be caused by a long list of pathogens (1).  Among bacterial causes, Legionella sp. (“classic” pathogen associated with rhabdomyolysis), Streptococcus sp. (including S. pneumoniae), Salmonella sp, Staphylococcus aureus, Francisella tularensis have been cited frequently (3).  Some series have reported a preponderance of aerobic gram-negatives such as Klebsiella sp., Pseudomonas sp. and E. coli  (1,2).   Among viral etiologies, influenza virus, human immunodeficiency virus, and coxsackievirus are commonly cited (2,3).  Fungal and protozoal infections (eg, malaria) may also be associated with rhabdomyolysis (5).

So how might sepsis cause rhabdomyolysis? Several potential mechanisms have been implicated, including tissue hypoxemia due to sepsis, direct muscle invasion by pathogens (eg, S. aureus, streptococci, Salmonella sp.), toxin generation (eg, Legionella), cytokine-mediated muscle cell toxicity (eg, aerobic gram-negatives) as well as muscle ischemia due to shock (1,5).

Bonus Pearl: Did you know that among patients with HIV infection, infections are the most common cause (39%) of rhabdomyolysis (6)? 

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

References

1. Kumar AA, Bhaskar E, Shantha GPS, et al. Rhabdomyolysis in community acquired bacterial sepsis—A retrospective cohort study. PLoS ONE 2009;e7182. Doi:10.1371/journa.pone.0007182. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19787056.

2. Blanco JR, Zabaza M, Sacedo J, et al. Rhabdomyolysis of infectious and noninfectious causes. South Med J 2002;95:542-44. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12005014

3. Singh U, Scheld WM. Infectious etiologies of rhabdomyolysis:three case reports and review. Clin Infect Dis 1996;22:642-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8729203

4. Shih CC, Hii HP, Tsao CM, et al. Therapeutic effects of procainamide on endotoxin-induced rhabdomyolysis in rats. PLOS ONE 2016. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150319. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26918767

5. Khan FY. Rhabdomyolysis: a review of the literature. NJM 2009;67:272-83. http://www.njmonline.nl/getpdf.php?id=842

6. Koubar SH, Estrella MM, Warrier R, et al. Rhabdomyolysis in an HIV cohort: epidemiology, causes and outcomes. BMC Nephrology 2017;18:242. DOI 10.1186/s12882-017-0656-9. https://bmcnephrol.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s12882-017-0656-9

My patient with sepsis and bacteremia has an extremely high serum Creatine kinase (CK) level. Can his infection be causing rhabdomyolysis?

My hospitalized patient with sepsis has persistently elevated lactic acid despite volume resuscitation, source control, and adequate oxygenation. What could I be missing?

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Although the causes of lactic acidosis are legion (eg, sepsis, tissue hypoperfusion, ischemic bowel, malignancy, medications, liver dysfunction), thiamine deficiency (TD) is an often-overlooked cause of persistently elevated serum lactic acid (LA) in critically ill hospitalized patients,1 reported in 20-70% of septic patients.2  Septic shock patients may be particularly at risk of TD because of increased mitochondrial oxidative stress, decreased nutritional intake and presence of comorbid conditions (eg,  alcoholism, persistent vomiting).3

Early recognition of TD in hospitalized patients may be particularly difficult because of the frequent absence of the “classic” signs and symptoms of Wernicke’s encephalopathy (eg, ataxia, cranial nerve palsies and confusion) and lack of readily available confirmatory laboratory tests.4

TD-related lactic acidosis should be suspected when an elevated LA persists despite adequate treatment of its putative cause(s) (4,5). Administration of IV thiamine in this setting may result in rapid clearance of LA.3-5

TD causes lactic acidosis type B which is due to the generation of excess LA, not impairment in tissue oxygenation, as is the case for lactic acidosis type A. Thiamine is an essential co-factor in aerobic metabolism, facilitating the conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-CoA which enters the citric acid (Krebs) cycle within the mitochondria. In TD, pyruvate does not undergo aerobic metabolism and is converted to LA instead, leading to lactic acidosis.

Bonus pearl: Did you know that because of its limited tissue storage, thiamine stores may be depleted within only 3 weeks of reduced oral intake!

References

  1. O’Donnell K. Lactic acidosis: a lesser known side effect of thiamine deficiency. Practical Gastroenterol March 2017:24.   https://www.practicalgastro.com/article/176921/Lactic-Acidosis-Lesser-Known-Side-Effect-of-Thiamine-Deficiency
  2. Marik PE. Thiamine: an essential component of the metabolic resuscitation protocol. Crit Care Med 2018;46:1869-70. https://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/Fulltext/2018/11000/Thiamine___An_Essential_Component_of_the_Metabolic.23.aspx
  3. Woolum JA, Abner EL, Kelly A, et al. Effect of thiamine administration on lactate clearance and mortality in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med 2018;46:1747-52. https://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/Fulltext/2018/11000/Effect_of_Thiamine_Administration_on_Lactate.5.aspx
  4. Kourouni I, Pirrotta S, Mathew J, et al. Thiamine: an underutilized agent in refractory lactic acidosis. Chest 2016; 150:247A. https://journal.chestnet.org/article/S0012-3692(16)56459-9/pdf
  5. Shah S, Wald E. Type B lactic acidosis secondary to thiamine deficiency in a child with malignancy. Pediatrics 2015; 135:e221-e224. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/135/1/e221

If you like this post, sign up under MENU and get future pearls straight into your mailbox!

My hospitalized patient with sepsis has persistently elevated lactic acid despite volume resuscitation, source control, and adequate oxygenation. What could I be missing?

How accurate are peripheral thermometers for estimating body temperature in my patient with chills?

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , Leave a comment

Though convenient, oral, tympanic membrane, axillary, and temporal artery thermometers (AKA “peripheral thermometers”) may not be highly accurate in measuring body temperature.

A 2015 systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of peripheral thermometers involving 75 studies (mostly in adults) found that compared to central thermometers (eg, pulmonary artery, urinary bladder, rectal), peripheral thermometers had a low sensitivity (64%, 95% CI 55%-72%), but much better specificity (96%, 95% CI 93%-97%) for fever (most commonly defined as 37.8° C [100° F] or greater).1

In the same study, for oral electronic thermometers, sensitivity was 74% with a specificity of 86%. For temporal artery thermometers, sensitivities ranged from 26% to 91%, while specificities ranged from 67% to 100%. For tympanic membrane thermometers, sensitivities ranged from 23% to 87%, with a specificity of 57% to 99%.

A 2016 study involving adult emergency department patients reported the sensitivity of peripheral thermometers (vs rectal temperature 38 C [100.4] or higher) as follows: oral (37%), tympanic membrane (68%), and temporal artery (71%). Specificity for fever was >90% for all peripheral thermometers. 2

So, it looks like while we may be pretty comfortable with a diagnosis of “fever” when our patient with chills has a high temperature recorded by a peripheral thermometer, lack of fever alone by these devices should not veer us away from the possibility of systemic infection. When in doubt and if possible, check a rectal temperature.

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

References

  1. Niven DJ, Gaudet JE, Laupland KB. Accuracy of peripheral thermometers for estimating temperature: A systematic and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2015;163:768-777. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26571241
  2. Bijur PE, Shah PD, Esses D. Temperature measurement in the adult emergency department: oral tympanic membrane and temporal artery temperatures versus rectal temperature. Emerg Med J 2016;33:843-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27334759

 

Disclosures: The listed questions and answers are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Catalyst, Harvard University, its affiliate academic healthcare centers, or its contributors. Although every effort has been made to provide accurate information, the author is far from being perfect. The reader is urged to verify the content of the material with other sources as deemed appropriate and exercise clinical judgment in the interpretation and application of the information provided herein. No responsibility for an adverse outcome or guarantees for a favorable clinical result is assumed by the author. Thank you!

How accurate are peripheral thermometers for estimating body temperature in my patient with chills?

200 pearls and counting! Take the Pearls4Peers quiz #2!

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Leave a comment
Multiple choice (choose 1 answer)
1. Which of the following classes of antibiotics is associated with peripheral neuropathy?
a. Penicillins
b. Cephalosporins
c. Macrolides
d. Quinolones

 

 

2. The best time to test for inherited thrombophilia in a patient with acute deep venous thrombosis is…
a. At least 1 week after stopping anticoagulants and a minimum of 3 months of anticoagulation
b. Just before initiating anticoagulants
c. Once anticoagulation takes full effect
d. Any time, if suspected

 

 

3. All the following is true regarding brain MRI abnormalities following a seizure, except…
a. They are observed following status epilepticus only
b. They are often unilateral
c. They may occasionally be associated with leptomeningeal contrast enhancement
d. Abnormalities may persist for weeks or months

 

 

4. Which of the following is included in the quick SOFA criteria for sepsis?
a. Heart rate
b. Serum lactate
c. Temperature
d. Confusion

 

 

5. All of the following regarding iron replacement and infection is true, except…
a. Many common pathogens such as E.coli and Staphylococcus sp. depend on iron for their growth
b. Association of IV iron replacement and increased risk of infection has not been consistently demonstrated
c. A single randomized-controlled trial of IV iron in patients with active infection failed to show increased infectious complications or mortality with replacement
d. All of the above is true

 

True or false

1. Constipation may precede typical manifestations of Parkinson’s disease by 10 years or more
2. Urine Legionella antigen testing is >90% sensitive in legionnaire’s disease
3. Spontaneous coronary artery dissection should be particularly suspected in males over 50 years of age presenting with acute chest pain
4. Urine dipstick for detection of blood is >90% sensitive in identifying patients with rhabdomyolysis and CK >10,000 U/L
5. Diabetes is an independent risk factor for venous thrombophlebitis

 

 

 

Answer key
Multiple choice questions:1=d; 2=a;3=a;4=d;5=c
True or false questions:1=True; 2,3,4,5=False

 

200 pearls and counting! Take the Pearls4Peers quiz #2!

Should I use qSOFA to screen for severe infections in my non-ICU patient?

FA Manian MD, MPH, , , , Leave a comment

Sepsis-3 qSOFA criteria—systolic BP ≤100 mg Hg, altered mental state, and RR≥22, with ≥2 considered positive— should NOT be used as either a screening or diagnostic tool for sepsis until properly designed prospective studies validate its utility.1

An important issue with qSOFA is its poor sensitivity for identifying patients with sepsis and its complications.  In a retrospective study of over 30,000 hospitalized patients suspected of infection in the emergency department or hospital wards, qSOFA ≥2 had a sensitivity of only 54% and specificity of 67% for in-hospital mortality or ICU transfer vs a much higher sensitivity of 91% but lower specificity of 13% for SIRS ≥2. Interestingly, most patients in this study met qSOFA criteria only 5 h before the studied outcome vs 17 h for SIRS ≥2 criteria.2

In another retrospective study of over 15,000 patients presenting to the Emergency Department with suspected infection, qSOFA ≥2 had a sensitivity of  49% and a specificity of 79% for hospital mortality vs  84% and 35% for SIRS≥2, and 65% and 74% for “severe sepsis” (Sepsis-2), respectively.3

So, using qSOFA alone to decide who needs prompt management of their infection (eg, blood cultures, serum lactate, antibiotics, fluids) may delay timely intervention in a substantial proportion of patients with infection that may become complicated by ICU transfer or death.  As is usually the case in medicine, it pays to look at the entire picture!

Liked this post? Download the app on your smart phone and sign up below to catch future pearls right into your inbox, all for free!

Subscribe to Blog via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

References

  1. Machado FR, Nsutebu E, AbDulaziz S, et al. Sepsis 3 from the perspective of clinicians and quality improvement initiatives. J Crit Care 2017:40: 315-17. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28478045
  2. Churpek MM, Synder A, Han X, et al. Quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and early warning scores for detecting clinical deterioration n infected patients outside the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: 906-11. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27649072
  3. Lembke K, Parashar S, Simpson S. Sensitivity and specificity of SIRS, qSOFA, and severe sepsis for mortality of patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected infection. Chest Annual Meeting, Toronto, October 29, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.427

 

Disclosures: The listed questions and answers are solely the responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official views of Mercy Hospital-St. Louis or its affiliate healthcare centers. Although every effort has been made to provide accurate information, the author is far from being perfect. The reader is urged to verify the content of the material with other sources as deemed appropriate and exercise clinical judgment in the interpretation and application of the information provided herein. No responsibility for an adverse outcome or guarantees for a favorable clinical result is assumed by the author. Thank you!

Should I use qSOFA to screen for severe infections in my non-ICU patient?